<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://jindalforinteconlaws.in/2026/04/08/who-decides-when-a-stock-is-overfished-the-wtos-new-legal-challenge-under-the-fisheries-subsidies-agreement/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Jindal Forum for International and Economic Laws</news:name><news:language>en-gb</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-08T04:30:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Who Decides When a Stock is ‘Overfished’?: The WTO&#8217;s New Legal Challenge under the Fisheries Subsidies Agreement</news:title><news:keywords>WTO Fisheries Subsidies Agreement, Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies (AFS), standard of review in international law, WTO subsidy discipline and fisheries, WTO environmental governance, deferential reasonableness standard WTO, institutional balance in WTO adjudication, developing countries and WTO obligations, special and differential treatment fisheries subsidies, Global South and scientific evidence standards, CBDR in trade and environment, illegal unreported unregulated fishing WTO, fisheries subsidies and sustainability, WTO disputes fisheries subsidies, how WTO determines overfished stocks</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://jindalforinteconlaws.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/deccanherald_2024-02_d557e964-de.jpg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
