<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://jindalforinteconlaws.in/2026/10/20/acharya-2/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Jindal Forum for International and Economic Laws</news:name><news:language>en-gb</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-10-20T13:39:06+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Two Statutes in Search of a Court: Will UNCITRAL&#8217;s New ISDS Courts Actually Work?</news:title><news:keywords>Multilateral Investment Court, UNCITRAL Working Group III, Permanent Appellate Tribunal, ISDS Dispute Resolution Forums, Investor State Arbitration Courts, Multilateral Instrument on ISDS Reform (MIIR), ICSID Convention, New York Convention, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, Sovereign Immunity from Execution, Mauritius Convention on Transparency, Achmea and Komstroy, Inter Se Modification, Opinion 1/17 EU, TFEU Articles 267 and 344, CC/Devas v. Antrix, Devas saga, ICSID Article 55 Immunity, WP.259 Permanent Tribunal Statute, WP.260 Appellate Tribunal Statute</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://jindalforinteconlaws.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/14339_united20nations20vienna.jpg?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
